|
|
|
|
| Contract ID |
0002.178.MW.5026
|
| Contract Type |
Site Management Services
|
| Contract Name |
Site Management Services
|
| Contract Description |
Provision of Site Management Services for the Design & Construction of a new bridge over Murrumbidgee River on the Hume Highway at Gundagai (Sheahan Bridge Duplication)
|
| Contract Commencement Date |
01 May 2007
|
| Period of Contract |
104
Weeks
|
| Contact email |
Ramaiya_NAIDU@rta.nsw.gov.au
|
| Successful Tenderer |
Professional Engineering Services Pty Ltd, 285 Victoria Place, Drummoyne, NSW 2047
|
| Cross Ownership Details |
None
|
| Amount of Tender |
$
2,208,681.20
|
| Cost Adjustment Provision (contract clause) |
Clause 15 |
| Remarks |
|
| a) Particulars of any related body corporate (within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 of the Commonwealth) in respect of the contractor, or any other private sector entity in which the contractor has an interest, that will be involved in carrying out any of the contractor's obligations under the contract or will receive a benefit under the contract |
Nil
|
| b) A description of any provisions under which the amounts payable to contactor may be varied |
If contractor required to work away from Gundagai eg. attend meeting in Sydney; If contractor required to provide other specialists to work on this project and if contract period is extended.
|
| c) A description of any provisions with respect to the renegotiation of the contract |
Nil
|
| d) In the case of a contract arising from a tendering process, the method of tendering and a summary of the criteria against which the various tenders were assessed |
Open advertised tenders. Assessment criteria used weightings. Major criteria included: Methodology, previous contractor performance, Proposed Personnel, Price. Other criteria included Quality, OHS and environment systems, proposed subcontractors and experience in incremental launch & balanced cantiler bridge construction.
|
| e) A description of any provisions under which it is agreed that the contractor is to receive payment for providing operational or maintenance services |
Nil
|
Significant Evaluation Criteria
(list below) |
Weightings %
(list below) |
| (A) Non Price |
|
| Methodology |
15 %
|
| Previous contractor experience |
10 %
|
| Proposed personnel |
25 %
|
| Proposed subcontractors |
5 %
|
| Quality system |
10 %
|
| OHS Management |
5 %
|
| Environmental Management |
5 %
|
| Experience in managing works involcing incremental launch and balanced cantilever construction |
5 %
|
|
(B) Price
|
20 %
|
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
