|
|

|
| Contract ID |
07.2668.1244
|
| Contract Type |
Community Attitudes Research
|
| Contract Name |
Drug drive attitudinal and behavioural study
|
| Contract Description |
There are two phases for the drug drive attitudinal and behavioural study:
1. Quantitative phase: Requires a telephone survey to be conducted with NSW drivers to explore attitudes and behaviours concerning drug driving.
2. Qualitative phase: Requires eight focus groups to be conducted to further explore key findings from the telephone survey.
|
| Contract Commencement Date |
13 Dec 2007
|
| Period of Contract |
28
Weeks
|
| Contact email |
Evan_Walker @rta.nsw.gov.au
|
| Successful Tenderer |
TOBUMO PTY LTD, trading as Taverner Research Company
Level 2, 88 Foveaux Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010
|
| Cross Ownership Details |
N/A
|
| Amount of Tender |
$
230,100.00
|
| Cost Adjustment Provision (contract clause) |
N/A |
| Remarks |
|
| a) Particulars of any related body corporate (within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 of the Commonwealth) in respect of the contractor, or any other private sector entity in which the contractor has an interest, that will be involved in carrying out any of the contractor's obligations under the contract or will receive a benefit under the contract |
N/A
|
| b) A description of any provisions under which the amounts payable to contactor may be varied |
The contract contains clauses which allow the RTA to order and pay for variations necessary to satisfactorily complete the contract.
|
| c) A description of any provisions with respect to the renegotiation of the contract |
N/A
|
| d) In the case of a contract arising from a tendering process, the method of tendering and a summary of the criteria against which the various tenders were assessed |
1. Demonstrated understanding of the objectives of this project.
2. The quality and suitability of the proposed research design including the methods proposed for collecting and analysing the data.
3. Demonstrated understanding of the challenges of recruiting a drug driving audience
4. Demonstrated ability to conduct quantitative rsearch.
5. Demonstrated ability to conduct qualitative research.
6. Demonstrated ability to conduct statistical analyses on quantitative data.
7. Demonstrated ability to present clear and concise reports using plain English for general audiences.
8. Experiences, qualifications, role and specific level of involvement of key project staff.
9. Demonstrated capacity and commitment to meet timelines.
10. Financial capacity to carry out the work required
11. Quality assurance system.
12. Demonstrated ability to meet RTA insurance requirements as set out in Annexure 4 of the Professional Services Agreement.
13. Total project cost.
|
| e) A description of any provisions under which it is agreed that the contractor is to receive payment for providing operational or maintenance services |
N/A
|
Significant Evaluation Criteria (list below) |
Weightings % (list below) |
| (A) Non Price |
|
|
(B) Price
|
N/A*
|
| * Price has not been included in weightings. Following determination of non-price score the tendered price and these scores are considered, then the tender assessed as offering the best value for money to the RTA is recommended for acceptance. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|