Heritage and conservation register

Item

Name of Item Karuah Bridge
Item Number 4305027
Type of Item Built
Item Sub-Type Steel Truss
Roadloc  
Address **** Pacific Highway Karuah 2324
Local Government Area Port Stephens 
Owner Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority)
Current Use Road bridge
Former Use Road bridge

 

Statement of significance

Statement of significance The Karuah Bridge is of state historical and technical significance as part of works associated with the rerouting and upgrading of the Pacific Highway, including the Department of Main Roads' policy of replacing earlier ferry crossings. The bridge was an important part of the area's infrastructure and had a significant positive impact on the local timber and tourism industries, being located on a route used heavily by this traffic. Remnants of the ferry crossing and the ferry master's cottage are extant, and, together with the Karuah Bridge, provide evidence of a past way of life and layers of continuous human use and occupation. It is technically significant as one of the first steel truss bridges in Australia on which high strength steel bolts were used in construction instead of rivets. Its use of an aluminium anti-corrosive coating was also innovative in bridge construction in New South Wales at the time. The bridge is aesthetically significant, having landmark qualities as a visual gateway to the township of Karuah. Its prominent location on the major route linking Karuah to the north is likely to accord it some social significance. Its design and construction is representative of steel truss bridges of its era.
Date Significance Updated 15 August 2005

 

Description

Designer V Karmalsky and G F Gilbert, DMR
Builder Horseley Bridge and Thomas Piggott Ltd, England (steelwork); Electric Power Transmission (erection)
Construction years **** - 1957
Physical description This six span steel truss bridge crosses a narrowing of the Karuah River just before it opens into a wide embayment. Trusses are of the Pratt Type with six bays per span. Joints are bolted and the members are either rolled sections or welded. The reinforced concrete deck is most likely composite with the six longitudinal beams which support each bay as simply supported. Support for the trusses is provided by cast bearings of spherical, and spherical rocker configuration. On the upstream side, the bridge has a footway supported on cantilevers with reinforced concrete deck. It has a three channel railing with infill mesh, and the roadway is bordered by two channel rails. Several utility pipes and rows of conduits hang from the bridge. Two beams run the length of the bridge beneath the deck, supporting an inspection gantry which is a steel framed platform with timber kick plates.

Abutments are of box type, with corner pillars beneath the bearings.

The piers, all of which are in the river, are of monumental style with two columns which are tapered and faceted in post art-deco style. They are connected by deep cross beams above the waterline and atop of circular pilecaps.

Some 40m upstream of the bridge are the ramps of the previous ferry crossing. Also upstream of this, on the southern bank, are remains of the ferryman's cottage.

Physical Condition
and/or
Archaeological Potential
Original condition assessment: 'Generally the bridge is in good condition, with the deck showing little sign of deterioration. Some of the painting system is nearing the end of its life, and corrosion has commenced in areas, typically undersides of horizontal steelwork. This is perhaps noteworthy as the bridge used an aluminium wire spray coating system which was unusual, and was originally installed in England, and then finished on site. Vehicle impact has caused some damage to the bridge. There are (mysteriously), two diagonal members in the western trusses (northbound carriageway) which have been deformed by southbound impacts. Also, the entry transverse top member at the northern end of the bridge has been damaged by an overheight impact. It is known that plans are in hand to repair these damages once the westward deviation of the highway has opened.' (Last updated: 22/09/2004.) 2007-08 condition update: 'Fair.' (Last updated: 17/4/09.)
Modifications and dates Various utility pipes have been supported from the bridge. Navigation lights were installed in 1993. These are solar powered. Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) files record numerous repairs due to vehicle impacts.
Date condition updated 17 April 2009

 

History

Historical notes The Karuah Bridge on the Pacific Highway crosses the Karuah River, which flows into Port Stephens, an undeveloped natural harbour. Captain Cook sailed passed Port Stephens, recording "an opening forming a bay" in 1770, but it was not until late in 1791, when a convict transport, the Salamander, visited the harbour, that a preliminary survey of was made. Governor Macquarie inspected Port Stephens in 1811 with a view to forming a settlement north of Newcastle, however, he found the land barren and did not proceed. Macquarie named the River the "Clyde" but this did not stick and the name "Karuah", of Aboriginal origin, survived, though its meaning is not certain. (Regional Histories, 1996, p. 36; The Australian Encyclopaedia, Vol. 7, pp. 206-207)

From 1816 onwards the area was a centre of cedar-getting activity and the industry was well established by 1823, with cedar being shipped to England from the port. Karuah was formerly known as Sawyers Point due to the timber cutters. In 1826 the Australian Agricultural Company (formed in 1824) made the port its headquarters. The Company was granted a huge tract of land from Port Stephens to the Manning River, encompassing the eastern side of the Karuah River. The other main activities of the region are fishing, oyster farming and tourism. The bridge over the Karuah River links two of the areas principal holiday resorts - Karuah at the head of the harbour and Tea Gardens on the Myall River inside the northern headland. (The Australian Encyclopaedia, Vol. 7, p. 207; Karuah Centenary Committee, 1984, p. 69, 78)

For many years, Karuah remained an isolated community. The river crossing was by means of a hand-wound punt and a row boat for pedestrians in the early twentieth century, and the crossing took fifteen to twenty minutes. Jack Dillon operated the punt from 1918 to 1923 and during that time he built a hut near the riverfront. In 1923 George Neil became Ferry Master, a contract he held for the next 24 years. Neil moved into the hut built by Dillon, and around 1926 built a cottage next to the hut site, on land that was granted to Neil on a 99-year lease provided that the family lived there. The cottage remained occupied until 1970 and was destroyed by fire some time later. Remains of the cottage are visible at low-tide upstream of the bridge on the southern bank of the river. The punt was succeeded by a power-driven, rope-hauled ferry around 1924, reducing the crossing time to a few minutes. The ferry operated until the bridge was built in 1957. For several years, difficulties had existed with the ferry service, including poor maintenance of the vessel and operating machinery, inattention to the boom gates by the operator, and Council's failure to deal with breakdowns, making construction of a bridge a priority. After the bridge opened the ferry was removed to Seaham on the Williams River, where it provided access between Seaham and East Seaham until a bridge was built there in 1973. Ramps of the previous ferry crossing are extant some 40 metres upstream of the Karuah Bridge. (Karuah Centenary Committee, 1984, pp. 73-74; Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) File: 10/410.1121 Pt. 1; Interpretive signage on site)

In 1940 the Department of Main Roads began investigating possible locations for a bridge over the Karuah River. The DMR's preferred location for a bridge was upstream of the wharf adjacent to the ferry. Plans for the new bridge were prepared in the 1940s by DMR engineers, Vladimir Karmalsky and G. F. Gilbert, but construction did not begin until the 1950s due to delays caused by the War. Suggestions that one of the spans of the old Hawkesbury Railway Bridge could be used at Karuah did not eventuate, partly due to difficulties in dismantling and re-erecting the old trusses, and also following advice from architect, Professor Wilkinson, who rejected the idea on aesthetic grounds. (Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) File: 10/410.1121 Pt. 1)

From the 1940s it was proposed to alter the route of the Pacific Highway between Newcastle and Taree so that it passed through Karuah, Bulahdelah and Nabiac rather than Stroud and Gloucester. The proposed route was more direct and allowed for a better quality road and, because the railway did not service that area, the new route was to stimulate development of a vast area of productive country not well served by transport infrastructure. The re-routing would also benefit the timber and tourist industries, providing quicker access to the coast for the large inland population. In particular, the road between Karuah and Tea Gardens carried timber transport and, in the holiday season, fairly heavy tourist traffic. Immediately after World War II the Department began an intensive maintenance and improvement program for the State's roads, which included a policy of eliminating ferries by replacing them with bridges. Concurrently with road construction of this period, work was begun on a number of important bridges on the Pacific Highway. The construction of the bridge over the Karuah River was therefore an essential part of the Department's program of the development of this new route of the Highway, which also involved improving and bitumen surfacing the road. (Main Roads, September 1956, pp. 3-4; March 1958, p. 74; Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) File: 10/410.1121 Pt. 1; DMR, 1976, pp. 58, 200)

The Karuah Bridge was one of a number of bridges having major steel spans constructed between 1950 and 1960 and is a typical example of steel trusses of its era. By the 1950s the Department was able to take advantage of economies in construction and maintenance costs in steel bridge design. During that period the Department's engineers evolved existing standards of bridge design to meet the demands of the post-war period for heavier vehicles and higher design travel speeds. The principal types of bridges constructed during the period were: reinforced or prestressed concrete, or steel, either beams with concrete decks for medium spans and trusses for larger spans. Whilst concrete was favoured for its durability, steel retained many advantages in spanning ability, speed and flexibility of erection and economy, giving it roughly equal billing with concrete over the following three decades. (DMR, 1976, p. 220)

The new bridge consisted of five steel truss spans of 120 feet each and one of 65 feet. The trusses were shop welded and field bolted. Instead of the usual practice - common since the 1930s - of using rivets for field connections, in this case, high strength steel bolts were used, which greatly facilitated the connection of the steelwork. This method was standard practice in the USA and had come into operation in Europe recently and the Karuah Bridge was one of the first steel truss bridges in Australia on which it had been used. The method would become common over the next decades as the 1950s and 1960s was an era of transition in bridge construction. (Main Roads, March 1958, p. 74; Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) File: 10/410.1121 Pt. 1)

Another innovative aspect of the bridge's construction was the use of an aluminium wire coating that was sprayed over the steelwork to prevent corrosion. One coat was applied to the metal work in England where it was fabricated, then a final paint finish was applied after it was erected. While similar aluminium coating was used successfully in structures all over the world, including the Forth Road Bridge and Severn Road Bridge in the UK, the Karuah Bridge was one of the first and more prominent bridges in Australia to use this spray. The Aluminium Wire & Cable Co. Ltd., which manufactured the coating wanted to use Karuah Bridge as an example in its marketing strategy and in lectures and technical articles. (Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) File: 10/362.1305 Pt. 1)

The bridge was designed so that it could be converted to a vertical lift span should that become necessary in the future to provide for navigation of the river. A footway was erected on one side because, even though there was not expected to be much pedestrian traffic (the majority of Karuah's population were concentrated on the southern side of the river), the increased volume of traffic posed a danger to pedestrians and motorists. The contractors for the supply and fabrication of the steelwork of the new bridge were Horseley Bridge and Thomas Piggott Ltd., England, and the steelwork was manufactured at the Company's works at Tipton, Staffordshire. Electric Power Transmission Pty. Ltd. carried out the erection and final completion of the bridge on site. Over 4,000 people were reported to have witnessed the official opening of the bridge by the Commissioner for Main Roads, Mr H.M. Sherrard, on 14 December 1957. (Main Roads, September 1956, p. 7; March 1958, p. 75; Karuah Centenary Committee, 1984, p. 85; Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) File: 10/410.1121 Pt. 1)

In the 1970s the bridge required extensive repairs due to the spalling of concrete on the bridge's cross beam soffits and cracking on some of its piers, caused mainly by windblown salt spray. Problems with vandalism also necessitated repairs. Major cracks in the deck slab, wearing surface and underside slab were also noted in 1983. Over the bridge's life it has often been damaged by trucks hitting its trusses and a number of serious accidents have necessitated major repairs to trusses and abutment members. Navigation lights were installed on the bridge in 1993. The volume of through traffic will lessen once the long-awaited Karuah By-pass is complete. (Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) Files: 10/362.1305 Pt. 2; 10/362.1305 Pt. 3)

 

Listings

Heritage Listing Reference Number Gazette Number Gazette Page
Heritage Act - s.170 NSW State agency heritage register       

 

Assessment of Significance

Historical Significance The bridge is associated with the re-routing and upgrading of the Pacific Highway between Newcastle and Taree to provide a more direct and better quality route thereby stimulating development of the surrounding areas and benefiting the timber and tourist industries that were so important to the region. The bridge replaced a punt, a process that was being undertaken by the Department of Main Roads on many crossings on the north coast in the post-WWII period. Remains of the old punt ramp and ferryman's cottage demonstrate this earlier phase of the crossing's history, and, together with the present bridge show the continuity of the historical process of transport across the river.
Historical Association ****
Aesthetic/Technical Significance The bridge is part of a series of steel trusses used to upgrade the Pacific Highway. It is particularly significant as one of the first steel truss bridges in Australia to use bolts in lieu of rivets for the connections. The use of sprayed aluminium wire coating was early or a first for New South Wales, having been used overseas. The bridge forms a visual gateway to the township of Karuah and a prominent feature of the landscape on the northern approach to the town.
Social Significance The bridge is an integral part of the township of Karuah. Its opening was attended by large numbers of people and it represented a major change in the way people accessed either side of the river.
Research Significance ****
Rarity ****
Representativenes The bridge is representative of steel trusses of its type, the Pratt Truss being widely used on road and rail bridges of the era. The fact that the bridge was one of the first to use some of the construction techniques newly developed in the 1950s enhances its representative significance.
Integrity/Intactness Good
Assessed Significance State

 

References

 

Type Author Year Title
Written  Chisholm, Alec H (ed)  1963  The Australian Encyclopaedia Volume 7 
Written  Department of Main Roads  1958  Main Roads (March 1958) 
Written  Karuah Centenary Committee  1984  Karuah 1884-1984 
Written  Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) (Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority))    Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) File: 10/362.1305 Part 2, Bridge over Karuah River at Karuah, General, 1974-1980 
Written  Department of Main Roads  1976  The Roadmakers - A History of Main Roads in New South Wales 
Written  Heritage Office, New South Wales  1996  Regional Histories 
Written  Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) (Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority))    Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) File: 10/410.1121 Part 1, Bridge over Karuah River at Karuah, Survey & Design, 1939-1955 
Written  Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) (Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority))    Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) File: 10/362.1305 Part 3, Bridge over Karuah River at Karuah, General, 1980-1993 
Written  Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) (Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority))    Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) File: 10/362.1305 Part 1, Bridge over Karuah River at Karuah, General, 1955-1974 
Other      Interpretive signage on site 
Written  Department of Main Roads  1956  Main Roads (September 1956) 

 

Study details

Title Year Author Inspected by Guidelines used
Study of Heritage Significance of a Group of Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) Controlled Bridges & Ferries  2004  HAAH - Sue Rosen and Associates    Yes 

 

Custom fields

Roads and Maritime Services (replacing Roads and Traffic Authority) Region Hunter
Bridge Number 1389
CARMS File Number ****
Property Number Bridge
Conservation Management Plan ****

 

Images

Oblique view of bridge from park on southern shore
Oblique view of bridge from park on southern shore

Interpretive sign regarding former punt crossing
Interpretive sign regarding former punt crossing

View across bridge from south
View across bridge from south

Southern ferry ramp with embedded timber rubbing strips
Southern ferry ramp with embedded timber rubbing strips

Opening plaque 1957
Opening plaque 1957

View under deck showing deck support stringers, wind bracing, rails for inspection gantry
View under deck showing deck support stringers, wind bracing, rails for inspection gantry

View of traffic entering bridge from north
View of traffic entering bridge from north

Northern entry portal top member damaged by impact
Northern entry portal top member damaged by impact

Diagonal truss member twisted by vehicle impact
Diagonal truss member twisted by vehicle impact

Remnants of ferrymaster's cottage - timber and brick piers
Remnants of ferrymaster's cottage - timber and brick piers

Typical connection with welded members and stiffeners, bolted on site.
Typical connection with welded members and stiffeners, bolted on site.

Southern abutment with pedestrian underpass. Note spherical fixed bearing under end span.
Southern abutment with pedestrian underpass. Note spherical fixed bearing under end span.

View of western face showing footway with its cantilever supports
View of western face showing footway with its cantilever supports

Deck joint closure at line of potential lift span
Deck joint closure at line of potential lift span

Northern ferry ramp
Northern ferry ramp

Interpretive sign regarding ferrymaster's cottage
Interpretive sign regarding ferrymaster's cottage

View down onto pier caisson showing solar panel for navigation lights. See also high pressure pipe supported by chain
View down onto pier caisson showing solar panel for navigation lights. See also high pressure pipe supported by chain